SCENES FROM AN EXECUTION

Synopsis: Venice 1571. An artist is commissioned to create a masterpiece, a celebration of one of the most decisive military victories of all time, the battle of Lepanto. A 1000 square foot immortalisation of Christian dominance over Islamic barbarism. But the artist creates instead a bloody and horrific condemnation of the State. Therefore, drastic measures must be taken.

Review: Newly formed theatre company Tooth and Sinew I quote “Are looking to change the face of independent theatre in Sydney. With direction, design and performance that is both highly theatrical and brutally honest, it aims to make its mark.” Reading the programme and seeing the calabar of artists across the board involved in this project, Tooth and Sinew have set themselves a high bar of expectation for themselves and their audience. I was excited to see what this company had to deliver with such highly skilled artists. I also had an admiration for their mission statement, myself being a firm believer that Sydney’s independent scene needs strengthening. Independent should not differ from its professional counterparts due to the minor difference between the two, so often being finance. Of course this is a huge part of staging a production but quality should never suffer because of it. The stigma of independent theatre has been created due to a lot of terrible unthought out productions that have left a bitter taste in the mouth of the general audience who attend. This is NOT the case for Tooth and Sinew, the moment you step into the quaint space of the Old Fitz you are delivered excellence.

Set Designer Andrea Espinoza’s design is elegant and complimentary to the story, no edge wasted or without consideration, a simplistic design with purpose. The set was enhanced by the addition of Ben Brockman’s ambient lighting design and Christie Bennett’s rich gold and red palette based costumes were ‘off the hook’ excellent.

Director Richard Hilliar must be commended for his efforts in bringing this piece of theatre to life. It would not have been an easy feat. Playwright Howard Barker has written an epic production that is extremely rich textually, poetically written hemmed in by politics and religion. It would have taken a tremendous amount of commitment and focus for Hilliar to ensure his actors knew who their characters were and their intentions. Hilliar delivered a well rehearsed production. The text moved swiftly, stage direction was purposeful and clear. I thoroughly enjoyed seeing the continuous pattern of triangles which were formed by props or persons. Triangles (if you studied Art History) were a significant process of the Renaissance movement in creating powerful imagery. I couldn’t help but wonder if this was as deliberate as I hoped it was. It was as visually unctuous as a painting itself.

Lucy Miller, as Galactia the artist in the spotlight, delivered with great conviction, vigour and passion. Miller had this character by the balls. Her choices were purposeful and without apology. It would have been tone setting and interesting to have seen her without makeup for this role though as I felt it masked her character slightly. This for me would have assisted the rawness in her femininity. That extra pinch of salt to an already seasoned performance.

Jeremy Waters, as Carpeta an average painter and Galactia’s lover played his character with an emotional frustration with tremendous energy. Waters was brave in his delivery, at times having some very striped bare moments that were blush worthy. Waters choices in physical expression to convey his characters anguish though over the top at times rung true to Carpeta’s situation. An enjoyable performance from start to finish.

Katherine Shearer, as Dementia/Rivera and Nicole Wineberg, as Supporta played Galactia’s daughters. Both ladies showed great spirit and naturalism in their performances which balanced some of the more animated characters in the story. Wineberg who often narrated to the audience what was unfolding on stage carried herself strongly from start to finish. Shearer gave the audience a vibrant performance with beautiful humourous under tones.

Peter Maple, as Prodo the man profiting from his ailments was funny and heartbreaking in his performance. Maple’s character tortured by Galactia’s words responded with a performance that left you feeling compassionate towards his case. An enjoyable watch throughout the story.

Brendan Miles, as Suffici/Sordo gave both his characters a vulnerability and vanity that was pleasing to watch, reminding us all that personal opinion on ideas or art is subjective in the eye of the beholder. Miles performed love-able characters, even though at times they came across a bit pig-headed. Miles had a gentleness in his delivery that had you loving them anyway despite this.

Lynden Jones, As Ostensibile the religious figure of State, gave a portrayal remarkably accurate to life. Passive aggressive in nature, Jones performed with an air of dignity and control about his character, secretive in his physicality a well paced performance.

Mark Lee, as Urgentino was a highlight for me, Lee’s stage presence demanded attention, you could not deny him your complete focus. Lee was animated in his delivery, a childish and fun caricature of a selfish rich powerful member of the State. His portrayal of Urgentino was full of charisma and humour. Lee has a tremendous ability to capture the imagination of the audience in his performance, their attention all his. A delicious performance.

Scenes from an Execution is a food for thought play. It’s content though based in 1571 Venice reminds us that though times may change, human nature seems to not have evolved as much in regards to power, artistic opinion, public opinion and power shifting persuasion. Who decides what is creatively sound? Good or bad? How does one become so hated then so loved? Through out the centuries artists like Galactia have been imprisoned and suffered greatly for their convictions produced in their art. Religious and political fear still controls so many in their opinion and acceptance or denial of others expression. This work is an epic exploration of thought regarding these matters. It has you checking your own personal views, in fact if you allow it, it too can feel very personal. There is a lot to digest and take into account, be ready to focus. What I took from this play was a challenge, sticking to your convictions is not often easy nor is dealing with other people’s projected fears and insecurities. Howard Barker has written universal questions for us to consider. See this play, Hilliar and company have produced a work of art that leaves ample room for the imagination to run wild. Tooth and Sinew have produced a gallant show!

13th May- 31st May at The Old Fitzroy Theatre, Woolloomooloo

THOM PAIN (based on nothing)

Synopsis: THOM PAIN in his quest for salvation will stop at nothing, except maybe a piece of lint, or the woman in the second row. In a surreal but touching exploration of death, rejection, love and fear, Thom Pain questions as much as he reveals, yet affirms life’s worth through a realisation of its unpredictable splendours amid its predictable mediocrity.

Review:

Julie Baz and company have done the wise thing of honouring Will Eno’s work with simplicity. This poetically written piece of theatre indeed needs no distraction by set design or flashy lighting techniques. The writing speaks for itself, it is witty and humourous, dry and thoughtful, crass at times and Thom Pain himself is both plain and complex.
The play itself whether due to the flow of the writing or the choices of direction felt very much more like spoken word or a dishevelled poetry reading, which I personally thoroughly enjoyed. David Jeffery playing Thom Pain begins the play in the darkness giving some account of himself with out the audience being able to see him. When we do get a glimpse of the man it is by several failed attempts to light a cigarette. This rawness of lighting technique was beautiful and mirrored the mood of Thom himself. David Jeffery’s interaction with a somewhat shy and reserved audience once lights were up was focused and at ease. Jeffery’s delightful and comical interaction with a late patron at the beginning of the show was highly amusing, I felt he was prepared for the possibilities of heckling of all sorts from his audience. In this case I have to say I wish I had been amongst more willing patrons, non the less the performance was solid and engaging. Julie Baz’s choice of musical support was perfectly placed to give a more enhanced sensation of the thought being discussed. Being taken on a journey of the mind is successful when the heart follows, the romance of life tagged swimmingly along with the mediocre themes of life. This production indeed travelled beautifully from the get go therefore I must say that providing an interval for this work was highly unnecessary and would have much preferred to persevere with Jeffery’s to the end of thought without interruption. Why this was provided was unclear and believe it should be extracted.

Thom Pain (based on nothing) is a discussion of the art of nature which is humanity, warm and scared, cold and fleeting, longing to be loved and to love. Life is indeed worth living through all it’s emotional and mental imageries that affect the heart and soul. Salvation is discovering and accepting this. Thom Pain himself concluding it is great to be alive, and of course he is right.

Thom Pain runs only a short while 5-10th of May at the Old Fitzroy. Get a ticket and treat yourself.

LOVE, LIES & HITLER

Sydney Independent Theatre Company’s Lies, Love & Hitler written by Elizabeth Avery and directed by Rochelle Whyte is a play about sex, politics and religion. A trinity story about Dr. Paul Langley a theologian professor who closely studies the life work of Dietrich Bonhoeffer a priest during WW 2 who helped plot to kill Hitler. Dr Paul Langley slightly mad has conversations with the dead man. Falling in love with one of his students Dr Langley finds himself in a moral Dilemma that creates internal toil and conflict. Bonhoeffer and Langley discuss his options and humanities moral code. What is right and what is wrong? Where does religion fit in all of it, when both are meant to be ambassadors of religious belief and discussion.

Love, Lies & Hitler is a wonderfully intelligent piece of writing. Playwright Elizabeth Avery Scott has written a story with tremendous clarity of thought. An interesting discussion and historical reflection of events side by side with a possible modern day current circumstance. Questions you begin to ask yourself and are asked by director Rochelle Whyte about your own moral standing on public circumstances regarding figure tyrants like Hitler and how your moral compass may decide what you would do if you were these characters is a fun personal exploration. The questions raised are strong and subjective according to ones personal view and belief of the world. Director Rochelle Whyte did well in conveying this bold and meaty play within the small and quaint space of the Old Fitzroy. The immediate stakes of audience responsibility by using us as apart of the story on the get go was a wise choice considering the work is written in a real theological debating matter with a lot to mentally digest. This choice indeed assisted in drawing in the audience to feel very much apart of each step the characters took.

James Scott, playing Langley held himself strongly throughout the production with humour and a continuous feeling of contempt towards himself and his struggles. I enjoyed Scott’s performance and his ability to transition between Langley and his smaller characters.

Doug Chapman, playing Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a wonderful casting choice by Rochelle Whyte. Besides Chapman’s uncanny resemblance to the historical figure his delivery was grounded and naturalistic. A believable figment of Langley’s imagination. A strong performance from both gentlemen.

Ylaria Rogers, played Hannah/Hermione. Rogers interpretation of Hannah (Langley’s student love interest) was direct and precise, though a humorous performance when needed I felt Rogers stakes were a lot higher being the only female part of this trinity performance and therefore the expectation also was higher. Rogers characters naturally have a very different emotional current to that of her male co stars. Therefore I would have liked to have seen more light and shade in her performance. There were many an occasion where the tone of the writing clearly had changed but Rogers did not change with that tone. The relationship between Hannah and Langley and their mutual visions of Bonhoffer felt like the DNA double helix and I was wishing to see this manifest continuously throughout their journey but felt a lack of contrast from Rogers performance which at times came across a little abrupt and thin.

Overall the cast and crew came together to create a beautiful piece of interesting and compelling work of theatre they should all be proud of. The passion was not lacking, and the commitment to the art form was honouring. Lies, Love & Hitler is a marvellous theatrical encounter that is designed to be discussed afterwards over a red wine late into the night. Reminding us that right and wrong is in the eye of the beholder, and it’s not always as black & white, nor are the answers to life’s questions and struggles as easy to conclude.

Lies, Love & Hitler runs until May 3rd. Get a ticket and a bite to eat at the Old Fitzroy don’t miss out.

20140428-112853.jpg